PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNI vs. MBNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNI vs. MBNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than MBNE's 0.84% return.


MUNI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
2.17%

MBNE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.25%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNI vs. MBNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
1.28%4.72%1.43%6.07%-1.18%
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
0.84%2.45%1.27%5.82%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNI and MBNE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.67

The correlation between MUNI and MBNE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNI vs. MBNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MBNE
MBNE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MBNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBNE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MBNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBNE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNI vs. MBNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUNIMBNEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

1.71

+1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

2.40

+1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.36

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.31

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.33

7.16

+2.17

MUNI vs. MBNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNI Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the MBNE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNI and MBNE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNIMBNEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

1.71

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.63

+0.16

Drawdowns

MUNI vs. MBNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, which is greater than MBNE's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and MBNE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNIMBNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-6.19%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-2.02%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.09%

-4.98%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.04%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-1.41%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.65%

+0.04%

Volatility

MUNI vs. MBNE - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) at 0.42%. This indicates that MUNI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNIMBNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.42%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

2.06%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

2.87%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

3.70%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

3.70%

+0.15%

MUNI vs. MBNE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MBNE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNI vs. MBNE - Dividend Comparison

MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than MBNE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
3.15%3.63%3.32%3.01%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.28%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNI and MBNE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUNI has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to MBNE (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs MBNE's -6.19%.

On 3-year performance, MUNI leads with 3.97% vs 2.97% for MBNE. On fees, MUNI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MBNE has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MUNI has performed better with a 3.97% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUNI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for MBNE.

MUNI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 3.15% for MBNE.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MUNI and 0.43% for MBNE.

MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNI and MBNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer