MUNC vs. VTEB
MUNC (Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MUNC is actively managed, while VTEB is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUNC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
MUNC vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUNC achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than VTEB's 1.44% return.
MUNC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
MUNC vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 0.96% | 3.78% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.44% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUNC and VTEB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUNC vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
MUNC
VTEB
MUNC vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNC) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUNC | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.47 | +1.76 |
Drawdowns
MUNC vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUNC drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNC and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUNC | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -17.00% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.54% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -2.32% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
MUNC vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUNC | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 2.71% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 3.90% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 5.26% | -2.55% |
MUNC vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUNC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MUNC vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
MUNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than VTEB's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUNC Northern Trust 2045 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 2.51% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.36% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUNC and VTEB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MUNC.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 2.51% for MUNC.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUNC and 0.03% for VTEB.
Find the right allocation for MUNC and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer