MULL vs. XTAP
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs 21.00% for XTAP. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
MULL vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.96% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and XTAP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.48 |
MULL vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MULL
XTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MULL
XTAP
Basic Materials
MULL
-
XTAP
Communication Services
MULL
-
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
MULL
-
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
MULL
-
XTAP
Energy
MULL
-
XTAP
Financial Services
MULL
-
XTAP
Healthcare
MULL
-
XTAP
Industrials
MULL
-
XTAP
Real Estate
MULL
-
XTAP
Utilities
MULL
-
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
XTAP
MULL vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 46.71 | 4.50 | +42.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.02 | 7.78 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 2.22 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | 14.82 | +101.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | 78.70 | +311.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | 4.50 | +42.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | 0.80 | +6.65 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -22.13% | -50.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -1.42% | -51.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -3.45% | -17.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 0.27% | +15.52% |
Volatility
MULL vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.41% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 1.10% | +54.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 3.16% | +102.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 4.70% | +127.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 14.54% | +121.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 14.41% | +121.81% |
MULL vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and XTAP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 21.00% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 0.79% for XTAP.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 4.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer