PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MULL vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MULL vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MULL vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
40.10%558.51%-40.10%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.38%-3.65%-9.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 40.10% return, which is significantly higher than URE's 2.38% return.


MULL

1D
18.15%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
40.10%
6M
196.67%
1Y
845.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URE

1D
0.74%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
2.38%
6M
-5.82%
1Y
-6.19%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-2.54%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MULL vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MULL vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MULL vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MULLUREDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.53

-0.19

+6.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

-0.05

+3.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.99

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

16.69

-0.26

+16.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.83

-0.79

+47.62

MULL vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MULL Sharpe Ratio is 6.53, which is higher than the URE Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MULL and URE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MULLUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53

-0.19

+6.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

-0.07

+1.98

Correlation

The correlation between MULL and URE is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MULL vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than URE's 2.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.28%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.29%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Drawdowns

MULL vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and URE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MULLUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.29%

-97.16%

+24.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

-22.93%

-30.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.05%

-57.49%

+18.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.99%

-64.63%

+42.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

7.62%

+11.30%

Volatility

MULL vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 47.87% compared to ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) at 9.32%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MULLUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.87%

9.32%

+38.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

99.70%

19.04%

+80.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.90%

32.48%

+98.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.06%

37.23%

+92.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.06%

40.49%

+89.57%