MULL vs. TSMX
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs 295.18% for TSMX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
MULL vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than TSMX's 85.80% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 85.80%
- 6M
- 94.81%
- 1Y
- 295.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 85.80% | 81.48% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and TSMX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MULL and TSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
MULL vs. TSMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MULL
TSMX
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MULL
TSMX
Basic Materials
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Communication Services
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Defensive
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Energy
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Financial Services
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Healthcare
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Industrials
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Real Estate
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Utilities
MULL
-
TSMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
TSMX
MULL vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 46.71 | 4.15 | +42.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.02 | 3.78 | +3.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.45 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | 8.51 | +107.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | 27.80 | +362.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | 4.15 | +42.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | 1.57 | +5.88 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than TSMX's maximum drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -63.80% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -34.93% | -18.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.27% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -15.85% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 10.68% | +5.11% |
Volatility
MULL vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.41% compared to Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) at 22.91%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 22.91% | +32.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 54.45% | +51.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 71.63% | +60.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 80.93% | +55.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 80.93% | +55.29% |
MULL vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than TSMX's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.44% | 8.01% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and TSMX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to TSMX (22.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 295.18% for TSMX. On fees, TSMX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSMX has been the lower-risk option at 22.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 295.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 1.05% for TSMX.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 4.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer