MULL vs. TSDD
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs -62.89% for TSDD. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
MULL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -4.27% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -42.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and TSDD is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | -0.35 |
MULL vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MULL
TSDD
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MULL
TSDD
-
Basic Materials
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Communication Services
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
MULL
-
TSDD
Consumer Defensive
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Energy
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Financial Services
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Healthcare
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Industrials
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Real Estate
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Utilities
MULL
-
TSDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
TSDD
MULL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 46.71 | -0.68 | +47.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.02 | -0.87 | +7.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 0.90 | +0.98 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | -0.83 | +117.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | -1.05 | +391.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | -0.68 | +47.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | -0.66 | +8.11 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -99.03% | +26.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -76.12% | +23.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -98.90% | +98.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -71.21% | +50.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 59.88% | -44.09% |
Volatility
MULL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.41% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) at 24.19%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 24.19% | +31.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 54.90% | +50.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 92.57% | +39.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 114.46% | +21.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 114.46% | +21.76% |
MULL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MULL and TSDD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
MULL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than TSDD's 8.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to TSDD (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -62.89% for TSDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSDD has been the lower-risk option at 24.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MULL and TSDD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
MULL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer