PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MULL vs. NVTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MULL vs. NVTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than NVTX's 709.31% return.


MULL

1D
2.92%
1M
216.81%
YTD
936.86%
6M
1,369.93%
1Y
6,074.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVTX

1D
37.55%
1M
188.72%
YTD
709.31%
6M
416.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MULL vs. NVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
936.86%270.91%
NVTX
Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF
709.31%-10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MULL and NVTX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MULL vs. NVTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NVTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MULL vs. NVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MULLNVTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

116.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

390.40

MULL vs. NVTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MULLNVTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.45

5.24

+2.21

Drawdowns

MULL vs. NVTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, smaller than the maximum NVTX drawdown of -89.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and NVTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MULLNVTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.29%

-89.20%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.79%

+10.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-60.85%

+40.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

Volatility

MULL vs. NVTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MULLNVTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.38%

266.88%

-134.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.22%

266.88%

-130.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.22%

266.88%

-130.66%

MULL vs. NVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVTX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MULL vs. NVTX - Dividend Comparison

MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than NVTX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.04%0.39%
NVTX
Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF
2.11%17.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


MULL and NVTX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVTX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVTX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

NVTX has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 1.30% for NVTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MULL and NVTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer