MULL vs. MMKT
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6388.53% vs 3.81% for MMKT. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
MULL vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 907.48% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.43% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- 246.94%
- YTD
- 907.48%
- 6M
- 1,268.17%
- 1Y
- 6,388.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 907.48% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.43% | 4.13% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and MMKT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
MMKT
MULL vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 49.08 | 16.49 | +32.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.09 | 62.61 | -55.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 15.14 | -13.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 130.56 | 153.44 | -22.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 439.01 | 912.50 | -473.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.08 | 16.49 | +32.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.34 | 17.60 | -10.26 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -0.04% | -72.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -0.02% | -53.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -0.00% | -20.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 0.00% | +15.79% |
Volatility
MULL vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.71% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.71% | 0.05% | +55.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 0.13% | +105.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.53% | 0.23% | +132.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.39% | 0.23% | +136.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.39% | 0.23% | +136.16% |
MULL vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than MMKT's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and MMKT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.71%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs MMKT's -0.04%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6388.53% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6388.53% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
MULL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 0.20% for MMKT.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (49.08 vs 16.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer