MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO
MULC.TO (Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF Hedged) and ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MULC.TO is actively managed, while ZEQL.TO is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MULC.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 19.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MULC.TO Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF Hedged | 8.50% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULC.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MULC.TO
ZEQL.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF Hedged (MULC.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MULC.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULC.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULC.TO and ZEQL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULC.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -6.12% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -4.17% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -1.65% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | — | — |
Volatility
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULC.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 13.59% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 13.59% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 13.59% | +4.57% |
Dividends
MULC.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison
MULC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MULC.TO Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF Hedged | 0.80% | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.83% | 1.39% | 0.77% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.39% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULC.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Manulife and BMO.
Find the right allocation for MULC.TO and ZEQL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer