PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUIGX vs. VFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MUIGX having a 11.48% return and VFFSX slightly higher at 11.71%.


MUIGX

1D
0.15%
1M
6.08%
YTD
11.48%
6M
11.29%
1Y
28.42%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
16.67%

VFFSX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.71%
6M
11.74%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
11.48%17.35%22.33%24.28%-21.86%30.48%19.17%47.45%-0.65%26.06%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
11.71%17.87%25.00%26.28%-18.14%29.24%18.35%31.88%-4.42%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MUIGX and VFFSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.98

The correlation between MUIGX and VFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUIGX vs. VFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUIGX
MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VFFSX
VFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUIGXVFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.36

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

15.70

-0.95

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUIGX and VFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUIGXVFFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.52

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.85

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Drawdowns

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUIGX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than VFFSX's maximum drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUIGX and VFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUIGXVFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.10%

-33.82%

-34.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-8.90%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-18.75%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-24.51%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-4.50%

-12.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.90%

+0.09%

Volatility

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX) at 2.83%. This indicates that MUIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUIGXVFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.83%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.98%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

11.86%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.90%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

18.41%

+0.08%

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUIGX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFFSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUIGX vs. VFFSX - Dividend Comparison

MUIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than VFFSX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUIGX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund
4.43%4.96%4.60%1.41%1.15%7.64%2.77%14.46%48.57%10.32%5.60%4.96%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
1.03%1.14%1.24%1.46%1.70%1.61%1.56%2.15%2.09%1.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MUIGX and VFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MUIGX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to VFFSX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUIGX dropped -68.10% vs VFFSX's -33.82%.

VFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUIGX and VFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer