MUD vs. SOXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MUD (Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. MUD is actively managed, while SOXS is passively managed. Over the past year, MUD returned -92.90% vs -97.76% for SOXS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUD charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.

Performance

MUD vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUD achieves a -80.97% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -93.50% return.

MUD

• 1D: 12.55%
• 1M: -38.07%
• YTD: -80.97%
• 6M: -81.60%
• 1Y: -92.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOXS

• 1D: 22.42%
• 1M: -47.74%
• YTD: -93.50%
• 6M: -93.24%
• 1Y: -97.76%
• 3Y*: -87.41%
• 5Y*: -80.25%
• 10Y*: -79.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUD vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	-80.97%	-78.75%	19.12%
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares	-93.50%	-85.53%	19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MUD and SOXS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.75

The correlation between MUD and SOXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MUD vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD

MUD Risk / Return Rank: 0
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

SOXS

SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 1
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUD	SOXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.28	-0.83	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.88	-3.41	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.58	0.63	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-1.00	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-1.51	+0.07

MUD vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUD Sharpe Ratio is -1.28, which is lower than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUD and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUD vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and SOXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUD	SOXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.89%	-100.00%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.52%	-97.94%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-99.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-100.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.50%	-100.00%	+3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.61%	-92.61%	+41.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	64.29%	67.48%	-3.19%

Volatility

MUD vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) is 38.19%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 66.67%. This indicates that MUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUD	SOXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.19%	66.67%	-28.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.00%	100.39%	-38.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.50%	117.32%	-44.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.99%	111.39%	-41.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.99%	102.09%	-32.10%

MUD vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUD vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.97%, less than SOXS's 83.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	30.97%	9.21%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares	83.05%	10.79%	5.45%	9.22%	0.19%	0.00%	3.58%	2.30%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUD and SOXS in my portfolio?

MUD and SOXS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUD or SOXS?

SOXS has higher volatility (66.67%) compared to MUD (38.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUD dropped -96.89% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, MUD or SOXS?

On 1-year performance, MUD leads with -92.90% vs -97.76% for SOXS. On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, MUD has been the lower-risk option at 38.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUD or SOXS?

Over the 1-year period, MUD has performed better with a -92.90% return vs -97.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUD or SOXS?

MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUD or SOXS?

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 83.05%, compared with 30.97% for MUD.

What is the main difference between MUD and SOXS?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MUD and 1.08% for SOXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.