PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUBFX vs. TOWFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Towpath Focus Fund (TOWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MUBFX having a 7.27% return and TOWFX slightly lower at 6.99%.


MUBFX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.08%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
13.39%

TOWFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.99%
6M
6.15%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
7.27%14.74%10.72%9.62%-4.54%28.60%13.62%0.28%
TOWFX
Towpath Focus Fund
6.99%23.51%13.22%12.33%-2.06%26.52%19.46%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MUBFX and TOWFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.88

The correlation between MUBFX and TOWFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUBFX vs. TOWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUBFX
MUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TOWFX
TOWFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TOWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TOWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Towpath Focus Fund (TOWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUBFXTOWFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.94

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

18.42

-7.86

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the TOWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUBFX and TOWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, smaller than the maximum TOWFX drawdown of -96.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and TOWFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUBFXTOWFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.31%

-96.18%

+42.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-4.72%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

-96.18%

+81.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.61%

-96.18%

+80.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-94.71%

+92.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-23.67%

+17.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.26%

+0.50%

Volatility

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Towpath Focus Fund (TOWFX) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUBFXTOWFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.94%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

6.92%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

9.19%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

1,041.97%

-1,027.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

915.78%

-897.93%

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TOWFX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUBFX vs. TOWFX - Dividend Comparison

MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than TOWFX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUBFX
MainStay WMC Value Fund
6.88%7.38%5.24%4.49%5.82%81.14%3.79%8.43%11.90%11.15%2.53%19.99%
TOWFX
Towpath Focus Fund
1.71%1.82%1.49%2.81%2.05%5.69%5.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUBFX and TOWFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOWFX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to MUBFX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUBFX dropped -53.31% vs TOWFX's -96.18%.

TOWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUBFX and TOWFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer