MUBFX vs. LSVVX
MUBFX (MainStay WMC Value Fund) and LSVVX (LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX returned 13.11%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for LSVVX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MUBFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LSVVX.
Performance
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX has outperformed LSVVX with an annualized return of 13.11%, while LSVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
MUBFX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.24%
LSVVX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 12.30% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 20.59% | 19.63% | 3.97% | 12.19% | -4.02% | 28.57% | -3.46% | 25.29% | -11.10% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and LSVVX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MUBFX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
LSVVX
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUBFX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.59 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 5.83 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 23.09 | -10.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and LSVVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -61.62% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -6.23% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -24.61% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -24.61% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -40.61% | +1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.76% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -12.10% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.58% | +0.16% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that MUBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.68% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 8.14% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.72% | 11.22% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 15.84% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 18.42% | -0.62% |
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, less than LSVVX's 11.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 11.35% | 13.69% | 2.45% | 6.57% | 5.41% | 3.67% | 2.40% | 21.48% | 3.91% | 1.98% | 2.37% | 2.38% |
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 6.57% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUBFX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUBFX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to LSVVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUBFX dropped -53.31% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.
LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUBFX and LSVVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer