MUBFX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
MUBFX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jan 21, 1971. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | -0.12% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 4.63% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 4.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MUBFX having a 12.39% annualized return and FGINX not far behind at 12.18%.
MUBFX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
FGINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
FGINX
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUBFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.84 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.47 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 2.55 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 10.90 | -6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUBFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.84 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 1.01 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and FGINX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, less than FGINX's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 7.39% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 10.86% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -54.80% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -11.56% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -16.21% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -37.37% | -1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -5.46% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -9.74% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.70% | -0.13% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) is 3.81%, while Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that MUBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 4.24% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 9.01% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 16.22% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 14.88% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 17.04% | +0.88% |