PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MUB.TO (Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF) and QDXH.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - MUB.TO is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Mackenzie, while QDXH.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. MUB.TO is actively managed, while QDXH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MUB.TO returned 1.74%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for QDXH.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF (MUB.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUB.TO achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than QDXH.TO's 12.19% return.

MUB.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.09%
6M
-0.25%
YTD
0.52%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.88%

QDXH.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.09%
6M
8.51%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF		0.52%4.32%5.19%6.36%-7.06%-0.79%5.91%5.34%1.02%
QDXH.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		12.19%21.99%13.25%14.25%-2.55%20.52%-0.42%20.43%-12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MUB.TO and QDXH.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF

Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with QDXH.TO:
QDXH.TO vs. QDX.TOQDXH.TO vs. HXDM.TOQDXH.TO vs. QTIP.NEOQDXH.TO vs. MGRW.TOQDXH.TO vs. THE.TOQDXH.TO vs. QQQQ.TOQDXH.TO vs. KNGX.TO

Return for Risk

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MUB.TO
MUB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MUB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
QDXH.TO
QDXH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QDXH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDXH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDXH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QDXH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDXH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF (MUB.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MUB.TOQDXH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.85
2.14

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.24
3.64

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.66

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

2.61

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

10.92

-7.48

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the QDXH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUB.TO and QDXH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUB.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum QDXH.TO drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB.TO and QDXH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MUB.TOQDXH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-31.75%

+18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.99%

-9.85%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.21%

-13.49%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-15.79%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.80%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-3.83%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.35%

-1.51%

Volatility

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF (MUB.TO) is 1.46%, while Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that MUB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MUB.TOQDXH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

4.54%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

10.28%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

11.99%

-8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

12.72%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.77%

15.43%

-8.66%

Dividends

MUB.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Dividend Comparison

MUB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than QDXH.TO's 2.29% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MUB.TO
Mackenzie Unconstrained Bond ETF		4.49%4.93%4.74%4.96%4.96%3.39%3.39%3.98%4.17%4.56%3.02%
QDXH.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.29%2.41%2.64%2.76%2.92%2.28%1.96%2.65%3.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MUB.TO and QDXH.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUB.TO is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while QDXH.TO is International Equity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUB.TO and QDXH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer