MUA vs. WFSPX
MUA (BlackRock MuniAssets Fund) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K) are both mutual funds - MUA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. MUA is actively managed, while WFSPX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MUA returned 1.67%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for WFSPX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUA charges 1.96%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.
Performance
MUA vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUA achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MUA has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.
MUA
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
WFSPX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
MUA vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUA BlackRock MuniAssets Fund | 4.18% | 3.26% | 10.44% | 2.94% | -22.43% | 6.23% | 1.28% | 23.23% | -9.69% | 16.48% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 8.08% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUA and WFSPX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994 | 0.10 |
The correlation between MUA and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUA vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
MUA
WFSPX
MUA vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniAssets Fund (MUA) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUA | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 2.50 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 11.12 | -8.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUA vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUA drawdown since its inception was -43.03%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUA and WFSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUA | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.03% | -58.21% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -8.90% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.01% | -18.74% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.31% | -24.51% | -17.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.03% | -33.74% | -9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -3.23% | -13.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | -12.75% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 2.00% | +3.33% |
Volatility
MUA vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock MuniAssets Fund (MUA) is 1.71%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that MUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUA | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 4.82% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 9.88% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 12.49% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.98% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.03% | -1.65% |
MUA vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUA has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUA vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
MUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than WFSPX's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUA BlackRock MuniAssets Fund | 6.16% | 6.22% | 6.03% | 4.84% | 6.72% | 5.06% | 4.35% | 4.37% | 5.12% | 4.61% | 5.24% | 5.25% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUA and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFSPX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to MUA (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUA dropped -43.03% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.
WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUA and WFSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer