MU vs. XONE
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while XONE (BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index. Over the past 3 years, MU returned 153.65%/yr vs 4.51%/yr for XONE. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MU vs. XONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 268.67% return, which is significantly higher than XONE's 1.16% return.
MU
- 1D
- -13.18%
- 1M
- 40.05%
- YTD
- 268.67%
- 6M
- 281.02%
- 1Y
- 763.60%
- 3Y*
- 153.65%
- 5Y*
- 68.00%
- 10Y*
- 55.31%
XONE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 268.67% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -5.48% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.16% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 4.74% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and XONE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank
MU
XONE
MU vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 3.17 | -1.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.47 | 22.32 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 96.07 | 116.52 | -20.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and XONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -0.40% | -97.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -0.16% | -30.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -0.28% | -57.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.18% | -0.10% | -13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -0.05% | -58.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 0.03% | +7.98% |
Volatility
MU vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 37.25% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.18%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.25% | 0.18% | +37.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.08% | 0.37% | +59.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.72% | 0.56% | +72.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.00% | 0.86% | +53.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.44% | 0.86% | +49.58% |
Dividends
MU vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than XONE's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.06% | 4.33% | 5.21% | 4.46% | 1.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and XONE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (37.25%) compared to XONE (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs XONE's -0.40%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.61 vs 6.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and XONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer