MU vs. XONE
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while XONE (BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index. Over the past 3 years, MU returned 150.98%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for XONE. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MU vs. XONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 278.41% return, which is significantly higher than XONE's 1.11% return.
MU
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 87.28%
- YTD
- 278.41%
- 6M
- 361.42%
- 1Y
- 958.34%
- 3Y*
- 150.98%
- 5Y*
- 67.58%
- 10Y*
- 56.13%
XONE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 278.41% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -4.73% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.11% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 4.74% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and XONE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank
MU
XONE
MU vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 3.57 | -1.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 31.98 | 24.16 | +7.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 126.47 | 138.74 | -12.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69 | 7.06 | +7.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 4.96 | -4.65 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and XONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -0.40% | -97.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -0.16% | -30.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -0.28% | -57.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.20% | -0.04% | -58.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 0.03% | +7.61% |
Volatility
MU vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 28.51% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.10%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.51% | 0.10% | +28.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.48% | 0.34% | +53.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.00% | 0.55% | +65.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.31% | 0.86% | +51.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.66% | 0.86% | +48.80% |
Dividends
MU vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than XONE's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.06% | 4.33% | 5.21% | 4.46% | 1.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and XONE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to XONE (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs XONE's -0.40%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs 7.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and XONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer