PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. TFPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. TFPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than TFPM's -15.14% return.


MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%

TFPM

1D
-1.44%
1M
0.36%
6M
-19.69%
YTD
-15.14%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
29.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. TFPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%30.35%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
-15.14%123.03%14.60%-1.81%14.71%32.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and TFPM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.11T

TFPM:

$5.81B

EPS

MU:

$44.42

TFPM:

$1.50

PE Ratio

MU:

22.05

TFPM:

18.71

PEG Ratio

MU:

0.08

TFPM:

0.14

PS Ratio

MU:

12.33

TFPM:

12.84

PB Ratio

MU:

11.10

TFPM:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$90.27B

TFPM:

$453.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$65.51B

TFPM:

$337.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$44.96B

TFPM:

$354.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. TFPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TFPM
TFPM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TFPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TFPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. TFPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUTFPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.12

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.23

0.62

+22.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

83.25

1.52

+81.73

MU vs. TFPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is higher than the TFPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and TFPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. TFPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than TFPM's maximum drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and TFPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUTFPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-36.48%

-61.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-34.87%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-34.87%

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.29%

-31.84%

+12.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.07%

-13.65%

-44.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.43%

14.19%

-5.76%

Volatility

MU vs. TFPM - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp (TFPM) at 15.53%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUTFPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.63%

15.53%

+18.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.19%

35.31%

+26.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.68%

44.54%

+31.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.75%

37.68%

+17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.65%

37.68%

+12.97%

Dividends

MU vs. TFPM - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TFPM's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
TFPM
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp
0.82%0.68%1.43%1.54%1.07%0.39%

Financials

MU vs. TFPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
41.46B
144.96M
(MU) Total Revenue
(TFPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MU vs. TFPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.6%
72.0%
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

TFPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a gross profit of 104.35M and revenue of 144.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

TFPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported an operating income of 97.00M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.

TFPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp reported a net income of 115.31M and revenue of 144.96M, resulting in a net margin of 79.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and TFPM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to TFPM (15.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs TFPM's -36.48%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and TFPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer