PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. ORLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. ORLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than ORLY's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed ORLY with an annualized return of 55.83%, while ORLY has yielded a comparatively lower 18.05% annualized return.


MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
26.49%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
751.18%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%

ORLY

1D
1.02%
1M
1.49%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-3.28%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
20.62%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. ORLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
-0.21%15.38%24.81%12.56%19.51%56.05%3.27%27.28%43.15%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and ORLY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1993

0.20

The correlation between MU and ORLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.12T

ORLY:

$76.69B

EPS

MU:

$21.26

ORLY:

$3.06

PE Ratio

MU:

46.18

ORLY:

29.76

PEG Ratio

MU:

0.17

ORLY:

3.20

PS Ratio

MU:

19.16

ORLY:

4.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$58.12B

ORLY:

$18.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$33.96B

ORLY:

$9.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$25.99B

ORLY:

$3.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. ORLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

ORLY
ORLY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ORLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORLY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ORLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORLY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. ORLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUORLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.02

+0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.91

-0.00

+24.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.64

-0.00

+94.64

MU vs. ORLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the ORLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and ORLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. ORLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than ORLY's maximum drawdown of -65.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and ORLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUORLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-65.42%

-32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-20.02%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-20.02%

-37.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-23.03%

-34.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-42.00%

-15.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-15.58%

+6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-10.78%

-47.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

10.77%

-2.82%

Volatility

MU vs. ORLY - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY) at 6.52%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ORLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUORLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

6.52%

+26.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.74%

17.78%

+39.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

22.82%

+46.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

22.63%

+30.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.12%

26.52%

+23.60%

Dividends

MU vs. ORLY - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while ORLY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
ORLY
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MU vs. ORLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.86B
4.56B
(MU) Total Revenue
(ORLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MU vs. ORLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.4%
51.5%
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

ORLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.35B and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

ORLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.61M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

ORLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of 604.18M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and ORLY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to ORLY (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs ORLY's -65.42%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and ORLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer