PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. INOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. INOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than INOD's 98.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed INOD with an annualized return of 55.83%, while INOD has yielded a comparatively lower 45.64% annualized return.


MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
22.15%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
746.93%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%

INOD

1D
-4.23%
1M
12.17%
YTD
98.04%
6M
92.56%
1Y
137.86%
3Y*
114.32%
5Y*
69.37%
10Y*
45.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. INOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
INOD
Innodata Inc.
98.04%28.92%385.50%174.54%-49.92%11.70%364.91%-24.00%10.29%-44.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and INOD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 1993

0.12

Over the past year, MU and INOD have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.12T

INOD:

$3.59B

EPS

MU:

$21.26

INOD:

$1.11

PE Ratio

MU:

46.18

INOD:

90.91

PEG Ratio

MU:

0.17

INOD:

0.02

PS Ratio

MU:

19.16

INOD:

12.60

PB Ratio

MU:

15.44

INOD:

28.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$58.12B

INOD:

$283.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$33.96B

INOD:

$76.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$25.99B

INOD:

$37.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. INOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

INOD
INOD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
INOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
INOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. INOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Innodata Inc. (INOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUINODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.31

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.91

2.20

+22.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.64

3.97

+90.66

MU vs. INOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the INOD Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and INOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. INOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, roughly equal to the maximum INOD drawdown of -95.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and INOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUINODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-95.47%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-63.03%

+32.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-63.03%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-74.44%

+16.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-74.44%

+16.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-16.95%

+7.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-60.07%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

34.83%

-26.88%

Volatility

MU vs. INOD - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Innodata Inc. (INOD) have volatilities of 32.86% and 32.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUINODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

32.31%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.74%

89.40%

-31.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

122.08%

-52.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

106.74%

-53.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.12%

89.36%

-39.24%

Dividends

MU vs. INOD - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while INOD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INOD
Innodata Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

MU vs. INOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Innodata Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.86B
90.10M
(MU) Total Revenue
(INOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MU vs. INOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and Innodata Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.4%
0
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

INOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

INOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

INOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innodata Inc. reported a net income of 14.90M and revenue of 90.10M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and INOD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to INOD (32.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs INOD's -95.47%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and INOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer