MU vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, MU returned 746.93% vs 137.32% for EMEQ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MU vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than EMEQ's 70.13% return.

MU

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 22.15%
• YTD: 244.07%
• 6M: 307.41%
• 1Y: 746.93%
• 3Y*: 144.69%
• 5Y*: 66.21%
• 10Y*: 55.83%

EMEQ

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 70.13%
• 6M: 81.37%
• 1Y: 137.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	244.07%	240.24%	-5.52%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	70.13%	69.78%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and EMEQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.63

The correlation between MU and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MU vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MU	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.83	3.89	+6.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.14	4.03	+2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.61	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.91	7.71	+17.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	94.64	28.78	+65.85

MU vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MU vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MU	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.25%	-19.99%	-78.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.28%	-17.91%	-12.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.07%	-5.69%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.16%	-4.05%	-54.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.95%	4.79%	+3.16%

Volatility

MU vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) at 19.34%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MU	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.86%	19.34%	+13.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.74%	32.54%	+25.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.66%	35.48%	+34.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.18%	31.87%	+21.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.12%	31.87%	+18.25%

Dividends

MU vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than EMEQ's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.62%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.05%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MU and EMEQ in my portfolio?

MU and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MU or EMEQ?

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to EMEQ (19.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 3.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.