MTUS vs. FRD
MTUS (Metallus, Inc) and FRD (Friedman Industries, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, MTUS returned 7.80%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for FRD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTUS vs. FRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUS achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than FRD's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUS has underperformed FRD with an annualized return of 7.80%, while FRD has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.
MTUS
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 17.37%
- 6M
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 40.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
FRD
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 16.66%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
MTUS vs. FRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUS Metallus, Inc | 17.37% | 21.44% | -39.74% | 29.06% | 10.12% | 253.32% | -40.59% | -10.07% | -42.46% | -1.87% |
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 19.41% | 35.33% | -0.26% | 58.98% | 5.34% | 37.91% | 15.73% | -12.71% | 26.02% | -14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUS and FRD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2014 | 0.22 |
The correlation between MTUS and FRD shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MTUS:
$0.07
FRD:
$3.57
MTUS:
297.76
FRD:
6.82
MTUS:
0.73
FRD:
0.19
MTUS:
$1.19B
FRD:
$584.35M
MTUS:
$98.30M
FRD:
$38.95M
MTUS:
$47.20M
FRD:
$26.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUS vs. FRD — Risk / Return Rank
MTUS
FRD
MTUS vs. FRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metallus, Inc (MTUS) and Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.87 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 4.01 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.24 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.34 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.23 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
MTUS vs. FRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUS drawdown since its inception was -95.38%, which is greater than FRD's maximum drawdown of -71.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUS and FRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.38% | -71.00% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.31% | -24.77% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.74% | -46.49% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.26% | -53.55% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.11% | -65.09% | -25.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.79% | -0.04% | -58.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.39% | -34.73% | -32.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | 11.53% | +0.12% |
Volatility
MTUS vs. FRD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Metallus, Inc (MTUS) is 11.21%, while Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that MTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 12.99% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.98% | 28.16% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.59% | 44.57% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.91% | 52.31% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.94% | 48.58% | +11.36% |
Dividends
MTUS vs. FRD - Dividend Comparison
MTUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.85% | 1.17% | 2.66% | 1.70% | 0.70% | 0.60% | 0.90% |
MTUS Metallus, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.01% |
Financials
MTUS vs. FRD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Metallus, Inc and Friedman Industries, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTUS vs. FRD - Profitability Comparison
MTUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metallus, Inc reported a gross profit of 25.10M and revenue of 308.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.1%.
FRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 167.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MTUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metallus, Inc reported an operating income of 2.90M and revenue of 308.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.
FRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported an operating income of 3.90M and revenue of 167.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
MTUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Metallus, Inc reported a net income of 5.40M and revenue of 308.30M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
FRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 167.97M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUS and FRD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRD has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to MTUS (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUS dropped -95.38% vs FRD's -71.00%.
FRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUS and FRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer