PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTSFY vs. UNP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTSFY vs. UNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTSFY achieves a -17.27% return, which is significantly lower than UNP's 25.35% return.


MTSFY

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.58%
6M
-21.78%
YTD
-17.27%
1Y
0.68%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

UNP

1D
0.67%
1M
6.96%
6M
26.93%
YTD
25.35%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
14.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTSFY vs. UNP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
-17.27%43.82%-0.71%34.87%-7.78%-8.75%-11.04%11.36%4.33%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
25.35%3.86%-5.10%21.61%-15.93%23.31%17.64%33.70%10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MTSFY and UNP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.16

The correlation between MTSFY and UNP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTSFY:

$25.51B

UNP:

$170.37B

EPS

MTSFY:

¥306.81

UNP:

$9.29

PE Ratio

MTSFY:

14.84

UNP:

30.89

PEG Ratio

MTSFY:

0.99

UNP:

6.18

PS Ratio

MTSFY:

1.52

UNP:

9.21

PB Ratio

MTSFY:

1.26

UNP:

8.77K

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTSFY:

¥2.74T

UNP:

$18.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTSFY:

¥604.28B

UNP:

$8.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

MTSFY:

¥547.07B

UNP:

$9.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTSFY vs. UNP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTSFY
MTSFY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MTSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

UNP
UNP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTSFY vs. UNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTSFYUNPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.21

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

1.95

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

4.78

-4.79

MTSFY vs. UNP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the UNP Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTSFY and UNP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTSFY vs. UNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTSFY drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum UNP drawdown of -67.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSFY and UNP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTSFYUNPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-67.49%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.16%

-12.28%

-23.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.16%

-17.75%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.16%

-31.83%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.65%

0.00%

-32.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.06%

-17.05%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.03%

5.16%

+10.87%

Volatility

MTSFY vs. UNP - Volatility Comparison

Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) at 6.82%. This indicates that MTSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTSFYUNPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

6.82%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.60%

17.67%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.87%

22.14%

+9.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.86%

22.82%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.67%

25.31%

+8.36%

Dividends

MTSFY vs. UNP - Dividend Comparison

MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.98%1.26%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
1.92%2.35%2.32%2.12%2.45%1.70%1.86%2.05%2.21%1.85%2.17%2.81%

Financials

MTSFY vs. UNP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and Union Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
741.27B
6.22M
(MTSFY) Total Revenue
(UNP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MTSFY values in JPY, UNP values in USD

MTSFY vs. UNP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and Union Pacific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
18.0%
69.9%
Portfolio components
MTSFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 133.63B and revenue of 741.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

UNP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Union Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.35M and revenue of 6.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.9%.

MTSFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 96.91B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

UNP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Union Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.46M and revenue of 6.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.5%.

MTSFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 59.90B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

UNP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Union Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 1.70M and revenue of 6.22M, resulting in a net margin of 27.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTSFY and UNP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTSFY has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to UNP (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSFY dropped -52.08% vs UNP's -67.49%.

UNP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTSFY and UNP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer