PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's -15.25% return.


MTRX.TO

1D
4.95%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
12.31%
6M
16.39%
1Y
76.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMAX.TO

1D
3.55%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-15.25%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRX.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRX.TO
MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTRX.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

0.46

+2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

0.83

+2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.12

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

0.54

+3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.98

1.52

+13.46

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRX.TO and QMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTRX.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

0.46

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.88

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between MTRX.TO and QMAX.TO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than QMAX.TO's 11.87% yield.


TTM202520242023
MTRX.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
11.87%10.79%10.90%2.01%

Drawdowns

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum QMAX.TO drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and QMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRX.TOQMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-26.77%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-22.86%

+8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-20.12%

+10.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-5.29%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

8.16%

-3.85%

Volatility

MTRX.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) at 7.64%. This indicates that MTRX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTRX.TOQMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

7.64%

+5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.35%

16.03%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.32%

26.26%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

23.56%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

23.56%

+8.03%