PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

MTRX.TO is traded in CAD, while AINF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AINF.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than AINF.L's -1.50% return.


MTRX.TO

1D
4.95%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
12.31%
6M
16.39%
1Y
76.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AINF.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-6.02%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
6.81%
1Y
52.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRX.TO
MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AINF.L
AINF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AINF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTRX.TOAINF.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

1.97

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

2.55

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.29

+1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.98

11.87

+3.11

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the AINF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRX.TO and AINF.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTRX.TOAINF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.97

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.00

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between MTRX.TO and AINF.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Dividend Comparison

MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while AINF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum AINF.L drawdown of -27.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and AINF.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRX.TOAINF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-28.79%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-13.54%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.93%

-7.70%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-5.59%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

3.89%

+0.42%

Volatility

MTRX.TO vs. AINF.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AINF.L) at 7.07%. This indicates that MTRX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MTRX.TOAINF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

7.07%

+6.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.35%

17.09%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.32%

26.71%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.59%

26.69%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

26.69%

+4.90%