MTLS vs. PRNT
MTLS (Materialise NV) is a stock, while PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Total 3D-Printing Index. Over the past 5 years, MTLS returned -25.18%/yr vs -8.04%/yr for PRNT. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MTLS vs. PRNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTLS achieves a 19.10% return, which is significantly higher than PRNT's 13.07% return.
MTLS
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 18.88%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 23.32%
- 3Y*
- -13.24%
- 5Y*
- -25.18%
- 10Y*
- -1.06%
PRNT
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- -8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MTLS vs. PRNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTLS Materialise NV | 19.10% | -21.16% | 7.24% | -25.40% | -63.13% | -55.97% | 196.07% | -8.59% | 57.59% | 65.49% |
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 13.07% | 6.70% | -8.72% | 13.37% | -40.26% | 8.99% | 40.18% | 13.06% | -17.81% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTLS and PRNT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MTLS and PRNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTLS vs. PRNT — Risk / Return Rank
MTLS
PRNT
MTLS vs. PRNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTLS | PRNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 0.89 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.15 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 3.40 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTLS | PRNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.89 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 | -0.31 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.11 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MTLS vs. PRNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTLS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, which is greater than PRNT's maximum drawdown of -66.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLS and PRNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTLS | PRNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.84% | -66.10% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.27% | -17.22% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.52% | -32.00% | -26.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.40% | -57.91% | -27.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.80% | -48.78% | -43.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -31.96% | -21.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 5.80% | +8.88% |
Volatility
MTLS vs. PRNT - Volatility Comparison
Materialise NV (MTLS) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) at 7.92%. This indicates that MTLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTLS | PRNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.17% | 7.92% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.33% | 17.01% | +13.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.59% | 22.26% | +24.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 26.07% | +28.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.23% | 26.74% | +32.49% |
Dividends
MTLS vs. PRNT - Dividend Comparison
MTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTLS Materialise NV | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.80% | 2.16% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTLS and PRNT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTLS has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to PRNT (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTLS dropped -94.84% vs PRNT's -66.10%.
PRNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTLS and PRNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer