MTLS vs. PRNT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT).

PRNT is a passively managed fund by ARK that tracks the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2016.

Performance

MTLS vs. PRNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTLS vs. PRNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTLS Materialise NV	-10.99%	-21.16%	7.24%	-25.40%	-63.13%	-55.97%	196.07%	-8.59%	57.59%	65.49%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	-8.53%	6.70%	-8.72%	13.37%	-40.26%	8.99%	40.18%	13.06%	-17.81%	18.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTLS achieves a -10.99% return, which is significantly lower than PRNT's -8.53% return.

MTLS

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -10.99%
• 6M: -11.31%
• 1Y: 0.41%
• 3Y*: -15.88%
• 5Y*: -32.75%
• 10Y*: -4.14%

PRNT

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: -8.53%
• 6M: -11.41%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -12.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTLS vs. PRNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTLS

MTLS Risk / Return Rank: 40
MTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 20
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTLS vs. PRNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTLS	PRNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	0.27	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.58	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.07	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	0.31	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.03	0.98	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTLS vs. PRNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the PRNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTLS and PRNT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTLS	PRNT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	0.27	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.59	-0.47	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.03	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between MTLS and PRNT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MTLS vs. PRNT - Dividend Comparison

MTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MTLS Materialise NV	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.86%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%

Drawdowns

MTLS vs. PRNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTLS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, which is greater than PRNT's maximum drawdown of -66.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLS and PRNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTLS	PRNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.84%	-66.10%	-28.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.27%	-17.22%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.45%	-57.92%	-30.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.87%	-58.57%	-35.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.64%	-31.59%	-21.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.11%	5.46%	+7.65%

Volatility

MTLS vs. PRNT - Volatility Comparison

Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) have volatilities of 8.04% and 7.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTLS	PRNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	7.88%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.98%	16.00%	+18.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.94%	24.89%	+24.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.56%	26.03%	+29.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	26.74%	+32.40%