PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTLS vs. PRNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTLS vs. PRNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTLS achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than PRNT's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MTLS has underperformed PRNT with an annualized return of -0.67%, while PRNT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.


MTLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
-11.31%
6M
15.25%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-6.90%
5Y*
-21.84%
10Y*
-0.67%
ALL TIME*
-5.12%

PRNT

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.69%
6M
4.38%
YTD
6.62%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
-8.69%
10Y*
2.37%
ALL TIME*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$412.01K$422.32K$832.57K
$141.16K$162.57K$305.15K

MTLS vs. PRNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTLS
Materialise NV
14.41%-21.16%7.24%-25.40%-63.13%-55.97%196.07%-8.59%57.59%65.49%
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
6.62%6.70%-8.72%13.37%-40.26%8.99%40.18%13.06%-17.81%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MTLS and PRNT is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2016

0.56

The correlation between MTLS and PRNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Materialise NV

ARK The 3D Printing ETF

Return for Risk

MTLS vs. PRNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTLS
MTLS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTLS vs. PRNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materialise NV (MTLS) and ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTLSPRNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.65

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

1.69

+0.05

MTLS vs. PRNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the PRNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTLS and PRNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTLS vs. PRNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTLS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, which is greater than PRNT's maximum drawdown of -66.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLS and PRNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTLSPRNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.84%

-66.10%

-28.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.27%

-17.22%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.76%

-28.55%

-28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.71%

-57.91%

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.84%

-66.10%

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.12%

-51.70%

-40.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.72%

-32.25%

-21.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.24%

6.61%

+6.63%

Volatility

MTLS vs. PRNT - Volatility Comparison

Materialise NV (MTLS) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) at 5.61%. This indicates that MTLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTLSPRNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

5.61%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.00%

18.43%

+9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.17%

23.22%

+20.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.86%

26.17%

+27.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.20%

26.74%

+32.46%

Dividends

MTLS vs. PRNT - Dividend Comparison

MTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MTLS
Materialise NV
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.73%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTLS and PRNT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTLS has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to PRNT (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTLS dropped -94.84% vs PRNT's -66.10%.

MTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTLS and PRNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer