MTG vs. SEZL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL).

Performance

MTG vs. SEZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTG vs. SEZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation	-9.62%	25.88%	25.68%	12.76%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	0.35%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-74.69%

Fundamentals

EPS MTG : $4.72 SEZL : $5.52
PE Ratio MTG : 5.56 SEZL : 11.54
PEG Ratio MTG : 0.23 SEZL : 0.02
PS Ratio MTG : 3.39 SEZL : 3.41
Total Revenue (TTM) MTG : $1.21B SEZL : $450.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) MTG : $892.08M SEZL : $246.69M
EBITDA (TTM) MTG : $748.66M SEZL : $173.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTG achieves a -9.62% return, which is significantly lower than SEZL's 0.35% return.

MTG

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: -9.62%
• 6M: -5.51%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 27.98%
• 5Y*: 16.50%
• 10Y*: 14.76%

SEZL

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -15.96%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: -19.19%
• 1Y: 75.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTG vs. SEZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTG

MTG Risk / Return Rank: 48
MTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MTG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MTG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 67
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTG vs. SEZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTG	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	0.75	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	1.71	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.23	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	1.15	-0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	1.69	-0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTG vs. SEZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the SEZL Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTG and SEZL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTG	SEZL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	0.75	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.59	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between MTG and SEZL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MTG vs. SEZL - Dividend Comparison

MTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation	2.21%	1.92%	2.07%	2.23%	2.77%	1.94%	1.91%	0.85%
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MTG vs. SEZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTG drawdown since its inception was -98.86%, which is greater than SEZL's maximum drawdown of -89.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTG and SEZL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTG	SEZL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.86%	-89.95%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.93%	-72.02%	+58.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.41%	-65.03%	+6.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.47%	-39.76%	-12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.73%	48.97%	-42.24%

Volatility

MTG vs. SEZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is 4.18%, while Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a volatility of 18.61%. This indicates that MTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTG	SEZL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	18.61%	-14.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.48%	57.73%	-40.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.04%	101.17%	-76.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.44%	138.64%	-113.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.62%	138.64%	-101.02%

Financials

MTG vs. SEZL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MGIC Investment Corporation and Sezzle Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 298.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SEZL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 129.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 298.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SEZL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 55.25M and revenue of 129.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

MTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a net income of 169.31M and revenue of 298.65M, resulting in a net margin of 56.7%.

SEZL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 42.69M and revenue of 129.87M, resulting in a net margin of 32.9%.