MTCIX vs. QILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX).
MTCIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1997. QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTCIX MFS Technology Fund | -14.15% | 16.39% | 56.76% | 54.42% | -36.18% | 14.11% | 46.45% | 38.84% | 1.85% | 38.78% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.41% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 38.39% | 32.01% | 1.52% | 25.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTCIX achieves a -14.15% return, which is significantly lower than QILGX's -12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MTCIX has outperformed QILGX with an annualized return of 18.56%, while QILGX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.51% annualized return.
MTCIX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- -14.15%
- 6M
- -11.52%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
QILGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 17.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTCIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MTCIX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank
MTCIX
QILGX
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTCIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 0.89 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 2.32 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTCIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MTCIX and QILGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison
MTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.97%, more than QILGX's 3.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTCIX MFS Technology Fund | 15.97% | 13.71% | 26.78% | 9.66% | 10.35% | 11.58% | 4.97% | 3.87% | 4.97% | 3.51% | 1.84% | 3.62% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.53% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTCIX drawdown since its inception was -82.78%, which is greater than QILGX's maximum drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTCIX and QILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTCIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.78% | -53.48% | -29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.59% | -15.55% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.74% | -30.05% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -31.68% | -11.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.59% | -15.55% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.02% | -9.01% | -21.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 4.69% | +0.83% |
Volatility
MTCIX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) at 5.49%. This indicates that MTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MTCIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 5.49% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 12.94% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.72% | 19.67% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 20.98% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 21.19% | +2.72% |