PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTCIX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTCIX achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly higher than MFEKX's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MTCIX has outperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 22.51%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.77% annualized return.


MTCIX

1D
0.78%
1M
14.71%
YTD
22.51%
6M
20.37%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
38.82%
5Y*
19.59%
10Y*
22.51%

MFEKX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.76%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.01%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
22.51%16.39%56.76%54.42%-36.18%14.11%46.45%38.84%1.85%38.78%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
6.33%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MTCIX and MFEKX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.95

The correlation between MTCIX and MFEKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTCIX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTCIX
MTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTCIXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.16

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

1.64

+1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.06

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

3.46

+4.48

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTCIX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTCIXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.16

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.66

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.84

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.87

-0.48

Drawdowns

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTCIX drawdown since its inception was -82.78%, which is greater than MFEKX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTCIX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTCIXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.78%

-36.06%

-46.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-17.27%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-23.22%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.74%

-36.06%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-36.06%

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.86%

-5.64%

-24.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

5.30%

+0.32%

Volatility

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Technology Fund (MTCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) at 3.59%. This indicates that MTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTCIXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

3.59%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

12.24%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

15.83%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.42%

21.89%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

21.20%

+2.86%

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTCIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTCIX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, less than MFEKX's 13.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
13.94%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MTCIX
MFS Technology Fund
11.19%13.71%26.78%9.66%10.35%11.58%4.97%3.87%4.97%3.51%1.84%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MTCIX and MFEKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MTCIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to MFEKX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTCIX dropped -82.78% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTCIX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer