PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSXAX vs. MHCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSXAX achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than MHCAX's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MSXAX has outperformed MHCAX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while MHCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


MSXAX

1D
0.12%
1M
5.75%
YTD
11.46%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.09%

MHCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
11.46%17.26%23.98%25.96%-18.52%28.13%17.86%30.69%-4.71%21.07%
MHCAX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A
1.40%6.44%6.90%11.27%42.57%5.10%4.82%12.76%-1.92%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MSXAX and MHCAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.35

Over the past year, MSXAX and MHCAX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSXAX vs. MHCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSXAX
MSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MHCAX
MHCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MHCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MHCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSXAXMHCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.68

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.55

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.18

16.91

-1.72

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the MHCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSXAX and MHCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSXAXMHCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.62

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.53

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.78

-0.22

Drawdowns

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSXAX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, which is greater than MHCAX's maximum drawdown of -29.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSXAX and MHCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSXAXMHCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-29.62%

-25.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-1.67%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-3.34%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-11.74%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-18.98%

-14.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-2.14%

-5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.35%

+1.57%

Volatility

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Volatility Comparison

NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that MSXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSXAXMHCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

0.77%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

1.72%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

2.27%

+9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

25.35%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

18.23%

-0.16%

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSXAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MHCAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSXAX vs. MHCAX - Dividend Comparison

MSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than MHCAX's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHCAX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A
5.98%6.06%5.90%5.56%40.91%5.00%5.52%5.58%5.94%6.20%5.69%6.72%
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
0.95%1.06%5.20%4.04%10.30%4.44%8.78%17.42%14.49%15.18%9.63%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSXAX and MHCAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSXAX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MHCAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSXAX dropped -55.48% vs MHCAX's -29.62%.

MHCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSXAX and MHCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer