PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSVVX vs. RIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSVVX achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than RIVSX's 33.23% return.


MSVVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.86%
6M
4.17%
YTD
9.36%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
11.61%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*

RIVSX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.85%
6M
24.74%
YTD
33.23%
1Y
46.92%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
9.36%8.85%13.89%12.04%-5.18%26.12%7.06%22.95%-2.26%
RIVSX
River Oak Discovery Fund
33.23%9.11%4.42%8.18%-14.53%24.78%29.00%30.36%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MSVVX and RIVSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018

0.86

The correlation between MSVVX and RIVSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSVVX vs. RIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSVVX
MSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RIVSX
RIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSVVXRIVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.41

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

4.96

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

17.32

-13.46

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the RIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSVVX and RIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSVVX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum RIVSX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVVX and RIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSVVXRIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-60.61%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-9.11%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-24.52%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-25.75%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.77%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-10.44%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.63%

+1.48%

Volatility

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Volatility Comparison

Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and River Oak Discovery Fund (RIVSX) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSVVXRIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

5.47%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

13.30%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

19.10%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

20.37%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

21.81%

+2.17%

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSVVX has a 3.06% expense ratio, which is higher than RIVSX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSVVX vs. RIVSX - Dividend Comparison

MSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 156.18%, more than RIVSX's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
156.18%170.80%7.98%4.49%2.89%23.76%0.44%7.93%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIVSX
River Oak Discovery Fund
0.22%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.15%16.84%14.54%3.81%17.54%5.48%0.00%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSVVX and RIVSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIVSX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to MSVVX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVVX dropped -43.18% vs RIVSX's -60.61%.

RIVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSVVX and RIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer