PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSVVX vs. MOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and MainStay WMC Small Companies Fund (MOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSVVX achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than MOPIX's 27.70% return.


MSVVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.75%
YTD
4.38%
6M
3.80%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*

MOPIX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.92%
YTD
27.70%
6M
27.77%
1Y
56.29%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
4.38%8.85%13.89%12.04%-5.18%26.12%7.06%22.95%-2.26%
MOPIX
MainStay WMC Small Companies Fund
27.70%12.69%16.07%10.97%-19.00%17.55%10.04%17.70%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MSVVX and MOPIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2018

0.93

The correlation between MSVVX and MOPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSVVX vs. MOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSVVX
MSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MOPIX
MOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) and MainStay WMC Small Companies Fund (MOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSVVXMOPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

3.20

-2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

4.37

-2.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.53

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

6.08

-4.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.65

22.94

-18.29

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the MOPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSVVX and MOPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSVVXMOPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

3.20

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.40

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.01

Drawdowns

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSVVX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum MOPIX drawdown of -68.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVVX and MOPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSVVXMOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-68.08%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-9.84%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-26.99%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-32.60%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

0.00%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-9.11%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.60%

+1.49%

Volatility

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund (MSVVX) is 4.31%, while MainStay WMC Small Companies Fund (MOPIX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that MSVVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSVVXMOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

5.92%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

13.71%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

18.68%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

22.81%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

23.38%

+0.68%

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSVVX has a 3.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MOPIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSVVX vs. MOPIX - Dividend Comparison

MSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.63%, more than MOPIX's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOPIX
MainStay WMC Small Companies Fund
0.12%0.15%0.39%0.33%2.34%29.42%0.00%0.50%18.09%8.32%0.59%0.37%
MSVVX
Mesirow Small Company Sustainability Fund
163.63%170.80%7.98%4.49%2.89%23.76%0.44%7.93%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSVVX and MOPIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOPIX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to MSVVX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVVX dropped -43.18% vs MOPIX's -68.08%.

MOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSVVX and MOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer