PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSVAX vs. FHMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund (MSVAX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSVAX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FHMIX's 1.33% return.


MSVAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.32%
6M
-0.35%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
1.49%
ALL TIME*
3.99%

FHMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.03%
YTD
1.33%
1Y
2.49%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSVAX
MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund
0.12%4.01%1.65%5.34%-10.42%1.04%
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
1.33%3.09%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MSVAX and FHMIX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.14

The correlation between MSVAX and FHMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSVAX vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSVAX
MSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FHMIX
FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund (MSVAX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSVAXFHMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

7.98

-6.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

28.37

-26.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

93.72

-86.64

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSVAX and FHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSVAX drawdown since its inception was -15.61%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVAX and FHMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSVAXFHMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-0.50%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-0.10%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-0.50%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.61%

-0.50%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

0.00%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-0.06%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.03%

+0.90%

Volatility

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund (MSVAX) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSVAXFHMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.00%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

0.54%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

0.86%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

0.80%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.78%

+3.59%

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSVAX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSVAX vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

MSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than FHMIX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHMIX
Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund
2.56%3.04%1.18%0.32%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSVAX
MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund
3.02%3.97%2.81%2.32%1.85%2.16%2.70%3.14%3.14%3.41%3.54%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSVAX and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSVAX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to FHMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVAX dropped -15.61% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.

FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSVAX and FHMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer