MSVAX vs. FSMUX
MSVAX (MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, MSVAX returned 3.51%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSVAX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.
Performance
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSVAX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.
MSVAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSVAX MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund | 1.73% | 4.01% | 1.65% | 5.34% | -10.42% | 0.33% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 1.47% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSVAX and FSMUX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MSVAX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSVAX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
MSVAX
FSMUX
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund (MSVAX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSVAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 2.69 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 4.63 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.71 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.15 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 11.49 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSVAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.69 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.11 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSVAX drawdown since its inception was -15.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSVAX and FSMUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSVAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | -16.27% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -2.68% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -5.95% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -5.46% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.83% | -0.91% |
Volatility
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund (MSVAX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 1.21%. This indicates that MSVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSVAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.21% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 2.10% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27% | 3.16% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 4.64% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.36% | 4.64% | -0.28% |
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSVAX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSVAX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
MSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.99% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSVAX MFS Virginia Municipal Bond Fund | 3.22% | 3.97% | 2.81% | 2.32% | 1.85% | 2.16% | 2.70% | 3.14% | 3.14% | 3.41% | 3.54% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSVAX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSVAX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to FSMUX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSVAX dropped -15.61% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.
FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSVAX and FSMUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer