MSTY vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. MSTY is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -62.19% vs 86.28% for QTUM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

MSTY vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -16.01% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.

MSTY

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: -27.19%
• YTD: -16.01%
• 6M: -25.33%
• 1Y: -62.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 12.73%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 86.28%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTY vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-16.01%	-42.71%	212.16%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	43.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTY and QTUM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024	0.52

The correlation between MSTY and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSTY vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTY

MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTY vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTY	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	2.94	-3.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	3.45	-5.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.46	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	5.46	-6.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	19.77	-21.05

MSTY vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTY and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTY vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTY	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.79%	-38.45%	-33.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.79%	-15.26%	-56.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.98%	-4.42%	-62.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.54%	-8.24%	-18.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.20%	4.21%	+43.99%

Volatility

MSTY vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.18%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTY	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.17%	14.18%	+4.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.63%	23.17%	+26.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.33%	28.39%	+32.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.88%	26.99%	+44.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.88%	27.40%	+44.48%

MSTY vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTY vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.17%, more than QTUM's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	241.17%	294.61%	104.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTY and QTUM in my portfolio?

MSTY and QTUM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTY or QTUM?

MSTY has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, MSTY or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 86.28% vs -62.19% for MSTY. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTY or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 86.28% return vs -62.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTY or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTY or QTUM?

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 241.17%, compared with 0.73% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between MSTY and QTUM?

MSTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTY and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.