MSTY vs. LFGY
MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -61.25% vs 9.18% for LFGY. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 17.68% return.
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFGY
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -48.89% |
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 17.68% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTY and LFGY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MSTY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank
MSTY
LFGY
MSTY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 0.25 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | 0.59 | -2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.07 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.26 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 0.56 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 0.25 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
MSTY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and LFGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -35.94% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.79% | -35.94% | -35.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.48% | -10.11% | -56.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -14.07% | -12.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.87% | 16.42% | +30.45% |
Volatility
MSTY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) at 10.56%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTY | LFGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.01% | 10.56% | +6.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.79% | 30.09% | +18.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.44% | 37.15% | +23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 41.96% | +29.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 41.96% | +29.96% |
MSTY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSTY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison
MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 269.45%, more than LFGY's 82.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 82.56% | 94.90% | 0.00% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to LFGY (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs LFGY's -35.94%.
On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 9.18% vs -61.25% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 10.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 9.18% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 82.56% for LFGY.
LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTY and LFGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer