MSTY vs. CONY
MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -68.04% vs -48.44% for CONY. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -32.53% return, which is significantly lower than CONY's -30.32% return.
MSTY
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- -27.05%
- YTD
- -32.53%
- 1Y
- -68.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.99%
CONY
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- -30.32%
- 1Y
- -48.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.23M | $6.56M | $10.07M | |
| $12.83M | $13.14M | $28.03M |
MSTY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -32.53% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -30.32% | -26.34% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTY and CONY is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MSTY and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
MSTY
CONY
MSTY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.86 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.82 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.25 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -77.40%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.40% | -63.57% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.91% | -59.52% | -15.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.47% | -60.53% | -12.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -24.18% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.95% | 38.86% | +12.09% |
Volatility
MSTY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is 13.25%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 16.94%. This indicates that MSTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.25% | 16.94% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.14% | 46.95% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.93% | 57.47% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.85% | 59.88% | +11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.85% | 59.88% | +11.97% |
MSTY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSTY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 248.73%, more than CONY's 168.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 168.48% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 248.73% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTY and CONY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to MSTY (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -77.40% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, CONY leads with -48.44% vs -68.04% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSTY has been the lower-risk option at 13.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CONY has performed better with a -48.44% return vs -68.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 248.73%, compared with 168.48% for CONY.
CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer