MSTY vs. CONY
MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -61.25% vs -42.39% for CONY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -25.27% return.
MSTY
- 1D
- -6.76%
- 1M
- -28.46%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -61.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -16.66%
- YTD
- -25.27%
- 6M
- -35.82%
- 1Y
- -42.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -14.73% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -25.27% | -26.34% | 35.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTY and CONY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MSTY and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
MSTY
CONY
MSTY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.89 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.67 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -1.13 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | -0.73 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
MSTY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -63.57% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.79% | -63.39% | -8.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.48% | -57.66% | -8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -22.17% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.87% | 37.68% | +9.19% |
Volatility
MSTY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 15.87%. This indicates that MSTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.01% | 15.87% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.79% | 43.66% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.44% | 58.29% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 60.06% | +11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.92% | 60.06% | +11.86% |
MSTY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSTY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 269.45%, more than CONY's 189.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 189.23% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 269.45% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTY and CONY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to CONY (15.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, CONY leads with -42.39% vs -61.25% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CONY has performed better with a -42.39% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 189.23% for CONY.
CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer