MSTY vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CONL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTY returned -66.58% vs -86.06% for CONL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

MSTY vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTY achieves a -27.80% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -65.46% return.

MSTY

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: -31.74%
• YTD: -27.80%
• 6M: -29.80%
• 1Y: -66.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: -7.83%
• 1M: -30.11%
• YTD: -65.46%
• 6M: -70.11%
• 1Y: -86.06%
• 3Y*: -14.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTY vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-27.80%	-42.71%	212.16%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-65.46%	-58.49%	11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTY and CONL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024	0.72

The correlation between MSTY and CONL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSTY vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTY

MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTY vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTY	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	-0.63	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.96	-1.10	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	0.88	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	-0.93	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	-1.25	-0.10

MSTY vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTY and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTY vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTY drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTY and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTY	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.79%	-94.36%	+22.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.79%	-92.57%	+20.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-94.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.62%	-94.06%	+22.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.97%	-56.45%	+29.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.36%	68.94%	-19.58%

Volatility

MSTY vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is 19.32%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 36.69%. This indicates that MSTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTY	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.32%	36.69%	-17.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.66%	102.83%	-53.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.02%	135.85%	-73.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.82%	149.59%	-77.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.82%	149.59%	-77.77%

MSTY vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTY vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 286.06%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	286.06%	294.61%	104.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTY and CONL in my portfolio?

MSTY and CONL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTY or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (36.69%) compared to MSTY (19.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTY dropped -71.79% vs CONL's -94.36%.

Which ETF is better, MSTY or CONL?

On 1-year performance, MSTY leads with -66.58% vs -86.06% for CONL. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSTY has been the lower-risk option at 19.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTY or CONL?

Over the 1-year period, MSTY has performed better with a -66.58% return vs -86.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTY or CONL?

MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTY or CONL?

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 286.06%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between MSTY and CONL?

MSTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CONL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTY and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CONL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.