MSTX vs. QQQY
MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTX returned -95.49% vs 36.38% for QQQY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
MSTX vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -54.94% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.
MSTX
- 1D
- -14.41%
- 1M
- -56.02%
- YTD
- -54.94%
- 6M
- -72.02%
- 1Y
- -95.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -54.94% | -89.06% | 137.37% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 19.07% | 14.96% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTX and QQQY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTX vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
MSTX
QQQY
MSTX vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.49 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 3.28 | -4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 13.95 | -15.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.68 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 1.25 | -1.67 |
Drawdowns
MSTX vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -19.05% | -79.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.62% | -11.14% | -85.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.61% | -0.36% | -98.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.94% | -2.91% | -67.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.26% | 2.61% | +72.65% |
Volatility
MSTX vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 39.64% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.21%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.64% | 4.21% | +35.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.57% | 11.30% | +101.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.09% | 13.67% | +126.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 14.75% | +152.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 14.75% | +152.71% |
MSTX vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTX vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 34.34% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTX and QQQY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTX has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -98.66% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs -95.49% for MSTX. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs -95.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.
MSTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTX and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer