MSTX vs. QQQY
MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTX returned -97.40% vs 21.17% for QQQY. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
MSTX vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -79.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 12.11% return.
MSTX
- 1D
- -8.53%
- 1M
- -18.21%
- 6M
- -76.83%
- YTD
- -79.12%
- 1Y
- -97.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -77.59%
QQQY
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $57.41M | $66.45M | $80.88M | |
| $1.79M | $2.09M | $2.92M |
MSTX vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -79.12% | -89.06% | 134.05% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 12.11% | 14.96% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTX and QQQY is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTX vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
MSTX
QQQY
MSTX vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.21 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 1.72 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 6.07 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTX vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.46% | -19.05% | -80.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.15% | -11.14% | -87.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.36% | -6.19% | -93.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.18% | -2.96% | -69.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 81.05% | 3.15% | +77.90% |
Volatility
MSTX vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 36.23% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 6.53%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTX | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.23% | 6.53% | +29.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 120.60% | 15.23% | +105.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.90% | 17.41% | +132.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.17% | 15.75% | +151.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.17% | 15.75% | +151.42% |
MSTX vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTX vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% | 0.00% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 37.47% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTX and QQQY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTX has higher volatility (36.23%) compared to QQQY (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -99.46% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 21.17% vs -97.40% for MSTX. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 21.17% return vs -97.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 37.47%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.
MSTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTX and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer