PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTX vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -71.19% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.


MSTX

1D
-10.71%
1M
-61.25%
YTD
-71.19%
6M
-73.53%
1Y
-96.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INTW

1D
10.59%
1M
28.23%
YTD
871.59%
6M
897.00%
1Y
2,279.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSTX and INTW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTXINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.68

-0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

46.81

-47.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

106.28

-107.51

MSTX vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTX and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTXINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-60.58%

-38.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.76%

-49.34%

-48.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.11%

0.00%

-99.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.60%

-29.71%

-40.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.39%

21.69%

+56.70%

Volatility

MSTX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) is 44.91%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that MSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTXINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.91%

53.88%

-8.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.95%

118.13%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.60%

149.77%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.05%

148.63%

+18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.05%

148.63%

+18.42%

MSTX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTX nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTX and INTW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to MSTX (44.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -99.11% vs INTW's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs -96.70% for MSTX. On fees, MSTX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, MSTX has been the lower-risk option at 44.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs -96.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

MSTX and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTX and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer