PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTX vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSTX having a -71.19% return and CRMG slightly lower at -71.26%.


MSTX

1D
-10.71%
1M
-61.25%
YTD
-71.19%
6M
-73.53%
1Y
-96.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
4.23%
1M
-29.64%
YTD
-71.26%
6M
-71.01%
1Y
-73.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSTX and CRMG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTXCRMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.79

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.97

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-1.70

+0.47

MSTX vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTX and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTXCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-79.83%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.76%

-76.80%

-20.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.11%

-78.97%

-20.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.60%

-39.18%

-31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.39%

43.41%

+34.98%

Volatility

MSTX vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 44.91% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) at 32.53%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTXCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.91%

32.53%

+12.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.95%

63.74%

+51.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.60%

76.12%

+67.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.05%

75.39%

+91.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.05%

75.39%

+91.66%

MSTX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTX and CRMG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (44.91%) compared to CRMG (32.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -99.11% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

On 1-year performance, CRMG leads with -73.99% vs -96.70% for MSTX. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 32.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRMG has performed better with a -73.99% return vs -96.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

MSTX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.75% for CRMG.

MSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTX and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer