MSTX vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTX returned -96.70% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MSTX vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -71.19% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

MSTX

• 1D: -10.71%
• 1M: -61.25%
• YTD: -71.19%
• 6M: -73.53%
• 1Y: -96.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTX vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF	-71.19%	-89.06%	134.05%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTX and BAMU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024	0.06

The correlation between MSTX and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSTX vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTX

MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTX vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTX	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	4.94	-5.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.26	8.71	-10.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	2.41	-1.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	24.37	-25.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	96.52	-97.76

MSTX vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTX and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTX vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTX	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-0.36%	-98.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.76%	-0.12%	-97.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.11%	0.00%	-99.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.60%	-0.02%	-70.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	78.39%	0.03%	+78.36%

Volatility

MSTX vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 44.91% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTX	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.91%	0.09%	+44.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	114.95%	0.39%	+114.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.60%	0.58%	+143.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	167.05%	0.87%	+166.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.05%	0.87%	+166.18%

MSTX vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTX vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	41.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTX and BAMU in my portfolio?

MSTX and BAMU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTX or BAMU?

MSTX has higher volatility (44.91%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -99.11% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MSTX or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -96.70% for MSTX. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTX or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -96.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTX or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTX or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

What is the main difference between MSTX and BAMU?

MSTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.