MSTW vs. USO
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. MSTW is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
MSTW vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -27.42%
- YTD
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 98.48%
- 6M
- 95.54%
- 1Y
- 97.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
MSTW vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -16.42% | -71.42% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 98.48% | -9.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and USO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
USO
MSTW vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | -0.18 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -98.19% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -85.39% | +9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -75.30% | +20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.81% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.79% | 44.26% | +44.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 36.04% | +52.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 39.00% | +49.79% |
MSTW vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 219.17% | 106.94% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and USO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer