MSTW vs. MUU
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). MSTW is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
MSTW vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -49.77% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -32.02%
- 6M
- -53.37%
- YTD
- -49.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -9.01%
- 1M
- -18.36%
- 6M
- 372.65%
- YTD
- 575.80%
- 1Y
- 2,796.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -49.77% | -71.40% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 575.80% | 455.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and MUU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MUU
MSTW vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTW | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 66.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 221.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -75.07% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.64% | -36.32% | -49.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -23.43% | -33.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.57% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 67.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 116.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.07% | 145.78% | -54.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 138.10% | -47.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 138.10% | -47.03% |
MSTW vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 411.61%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 411.61% | 106.94% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.70% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and MUU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 411.61%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.
MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer