MSTW vs. MAGS
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
MSTW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 4.87% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -27.42%
- YTD
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 33.10%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -16.42% | -71.42% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.87% | 16.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and MAGS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
MAGS
MSTW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | 1.57 | -2.48 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -29.91% | -51.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -2.50% | -73.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -4.70% | -49.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.79% | 20.05% | +68.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 25.95% | +62.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 25.95% | +62.84% |
MSTW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than MAGS's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.41% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 219.17% | 106.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 1.41% for MAGS.
MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer