MSTW vs. EINC

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. MSTW is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTW returned -82.53% vs 26.83% for EINC. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EINC.

Performance

MSTW vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -45.96% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.60% return.

MSTW

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -3.57%
• 6M: -33.17%
• YTD: -45.96%
• 1Y: -82.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -83.62%

EINC

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 14.53%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 22.23%
• 10Y*: 11.04%
• ALL TIME*: 0.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	$736.56K	$2.64M	$2.24M
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$1.29M	$1.31M	$2.87M

MSTW vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-45.96%	-71.40%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.60%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and EINC is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

MSTW vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTW

MSTW Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSTW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 67
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTW vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTW	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	1.74	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.10	2.38	-4.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.30	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	3.42	-4.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	8.30	-9.60

MSTW vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTW and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, roughly equal to the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTW	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.29%	-87.55%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.75%	-7.89%	-78.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.56%	-5.54%	-79.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.08%	-43.81%	-15.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	63.67%	3.24%	+60.43%

Volatility

MSTW vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) has a higher volatility of 19.58% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.14%. This indicates that MSTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTW	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.58%	5.14%	+14.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.73%	12.44%	+60.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.38%	15.55%	+74.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.96%	19.51%	+70.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.96%	25.33%	+64.63%

MSTW vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTW vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 379.51%, more than EINC's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	4.31%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	379.51%	106.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTW and EINC in my portfolio?

MSTW and EINC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTW or EINC?

MSTW has higher volatility (19.58%) compared to EINC (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTW dropped -87.29% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, MSTW or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 26.83% vs -82.53% for MSTW. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTW or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 26.83% return vs -82.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTW or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTW or EINC?

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 379.51%, compared with 4.31% for EINC.

What is the main difference between MSTW and EINC?

MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.46% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.