PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTW vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTW vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSTW

1D
-10.09%
1M
-27.42%
YTD
-16.42%
6M
-33.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTW vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and ACII is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTW vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTW vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTWACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.92

-4.37

+3.45

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -0.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTWACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.85%

-0.32%

-81.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.11%

-0.32%

-75.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.38%

-0.14%

-54.24%

Volatility

MSTW vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTWACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.79%

3.15%

+85.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.79%

3.15%

+85.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.79%

3.15%

+85.64%

MSTW vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTW vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than ACII's 0.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MSTW and ACII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 0.73% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTW and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer