MSTU vs. USFR
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. MSTU is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTU returned -95.37% vs 4.03% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
MSTU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- -14.03%
- 1M
- -55.66%
- YTD
- -54.27%
- 6M
- -71.83%
- 1Y
- -95.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
MSTU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -54.27% | -89.07% | 197.84% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and USFR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
USFR
MSTU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -52.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 13.43 | -12.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 203.42 | -204.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 787.84 | -789.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 15.11 | -15.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 1.60 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -1.36% | -97.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.58% | -0.02% | -96.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.52% | 0.00% | -98.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.94% | -0.16% | -71.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.17% | 0.01% | +75.16% |
Volatility
MSTU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 39.06% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.06% | 0.06% | +39.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.87% | 0.18% | +111.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.62% | 0.27% | +138.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 0.40% | +168.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 0.81% | +168.25% |
MSTU vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTU and USFR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -98.58% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 1-year performance, USFR leads with 4.03% vs -95.37% for MSTU. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFR has performed better with a 4.03% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer