PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. DKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. DKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than DKS's 12.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSTR having a 20.92% annualized return and DKS not far ahead at 21.90%.


MSTR

1D
3.18%
1M
-30.37%
YTD
-18.41%
6M
-29.74%
1Y
-67.36%
3Y*
63.46%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
20.92%

DKS

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.99%
6M
4.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
21.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. DKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-18.41%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
12.99%-11.45%58.91%25.94%6.61%116.67%17.94%63.22%11.35%-44.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and DKS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

0.31

The correlation between MSTR and DKS shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$41.40B

DKS:

$19.98B

EPS

MSTR:

-$40.19

DKS:

$3.67K

PS Ratio

MSTR:

77.72

DKS:

0.00

PB Ratio

MSTR:

1.13

DKS:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

DKS:

$5.18T

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

DKS:

$1.69T

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

DKS:

$451.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. DKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DKS
DKS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. DKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTRDKSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.13

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

1.22

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

2.81

-4.08

MSTR vs. DKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the DKS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and DKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. DKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than DKS's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and DKS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRDKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-73.33%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-19.37%

-57.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-32.73%

-44.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-48.79%

-35.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-70.82%

-18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.84%

-8.44%

-65.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.45%

-17.96%

-68.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.01%

8.38%

+44.63%

Volatility

MSTR vs. DKS - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) at 13.99%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRDKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

13.99%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.34%

24.66%

+32.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.15%

35.97%

+35.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.79%

43.53%

+47.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.80%

45.34%

+28.46%

Dividends

MSTR vs. DKS - Dividend Comparison

MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
2.78%2.45%1.92%2.72%1.62%6.17%2.22%2.22%2.88%2.37%1.14%1.56%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSTR vs. DKS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T20222023202420252026
124.30M
5.16T
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(DKS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and DKS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to DKS (13.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs DKS's -73.33%.

DKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and DKS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer