PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DKS vs. FLWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DKS vs. FLWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DKS achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than FLWS's -1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DKS has outperformed FLWS with an annualized return of 21.99%, while FLWS has yielded a comparatively lower -7.38% annualized return.


DKS

1D
-0.47%
1M
7.43%
YTD
14.95%
6M
9.43%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
23.39%
10Y*
21.99%

FLWS

1D
-9.37%
1M
-9.79%
YTD
-1.53%
6M
-15.13%
1Y
-24.41%
3Y*
-21.20%
5Y*
-35.65%
10Y*
-7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DKS vs. FLWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
14.95%-11.45%58.91%25.94%6.61%116.67%17.94%63.22%11.35%-44.79%
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
-1.53%-51.90%-24.21%12.76%-59.09%-10.12%79.31%18.56%14.30%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DKS and FLWS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2002

0.31

The correlation between DKS and FLWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DKS:

$20.33B

FLWS:

$247.05M

EPS

DKS:

$3.67K

FLWS:

-$2.11

PS Ratio

DKS:

0.00

FLWS:

0.16

PB Ratio

DKS:

0.00

FLWS:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

DKS:

$5.18T

FLWS:

$1.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DKS:

$1.69T

FLWS:

$588.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

DKS:

$451.62B

FLWS:

-$65.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DKS vs. FLWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DKS
DKS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FLWS
FLWS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FLWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DKS vs. FLWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DKSFLWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

-0.43

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

-0.63

+4.41

DKS vs. FLWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DKS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the FLWS Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DKS and FLWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DKS vs. FLWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DKS drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum FLWS drawdown of -95.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DKS and FLWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DKSFLWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.33%

-95.91%

+22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.37%

-56.77%

+37.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.73%

-73.43%

+40.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

-91.49%

+42.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.82%

-92.10%

+21.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-89.81%

+82.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.96%

-63.21%

+45.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

38.88%

-30.51%

Volatility

DKS vs. FLWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) is 13.32%, while 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) has a volatility of 19.51%. This indicates that DKS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DKSFLWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

19.51%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.74%

52.02%

-27.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.87%

84.75%

-48.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.51%

64.58%

-21.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.36%

57.58%

-12.22%

Dividends

DKS vs. FLWS - Dividend Comparison

DKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while FLWS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
2.19%2.45%1.92%2.72%1.62%6.17%2.22%2.22%2.88%2.37%1.14%1.56%
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DKS vs. FLWS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T20222023202420252026
5.16T
293.01M
(DKS) Total Revenue
(FLWS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DKS vs. FLWS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
32.6%
33.2%
Portfolio components
DKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68T and revenue of 5.16T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

FLWS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.30M and revenue of 293.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.

DKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported an operating income of 450.65B and revenue of 5.16T, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

FLWS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. reported an operating income of -94.56M and revenue of 293.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -32.3%.

DKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. reported a net income of 319.82B and revenue of 5.16T, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

FLWS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. reported a net income of -100.06M and revenue of 293.01M, resulting in a net margin of -34.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DKS and FLWS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLWS has higher volatility (19.51%) compared to DKS (13.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DKS dropped -73.33% vs FLWS's -95.91%.

DKS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DKS and FLWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer